Enfrentar la etnografía.
Afinando la construcción de significado a través de métodos visuales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26489/rvs.v37i54.8Palabras clave:
etnografía, imágenes, métodos cualitativos, métodos creativos, sociologíaResumen
La etnografía sociológica ha ganado mayor aceptación entre los sociólogos debido a su capacidad para comprender la vida cotidiana a un nivel microsocial. El pensamiento inductivo desempeña un papel crucial en la formulación teórica, ya que la recopilación de datos conduce al surgimiento de hipótesis y destaca conexiones con patrones universales. Sin embargo, la literatura etnográfica tiende a centrarse más en técnicas de observación y descuida otros métodos de campo. Para abordar esta laguna, este artículo analiza el uso de métodos visuales, como sociogramas y dibujos hechos por participantes, en un estudio de caso. Estas herramientas mejoraron la profundidad del significado en el proceso de investigación etnográfica.
Descargas
Referencias
Allen, Q. (2012). Photographs and stories: ethics, benefits and dilemmas of using participant photography with Black middle-class male youth. Qualitative Research, 12(4), pp. 443-458.
Atkinson, P.; A. Coffey; S. Delamont; J. Lofland y L. Lofland (2007). Handbook of ethnography. Londres: Sage.
Ayala, R. y T. Koch (2019). The image of ethnography-Making sense of the social through images: A structured method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919843014
Ayala, R. y T. Koch (2012). Facing ethnography: Non-conventional methods. Second Global Conference for Qualitative Health Research, Milán, 28 al 30 de junio.
Ayala, R.; T. Koch y H. Messing (2019). Understanding the prospect of success in professional training: an ethnography into the assessment of problem-based learning. Ethnography y Education, 14(1), pp. 65-83.
Becker, H. (2002). Visual evidence: A seventh man, the specified generalization, and the work of the reader. Visual Studies, 17(1), pp. 3-11.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. En: J. Holstein y J. Gubrium. Handbook of constructionist research. Nueva York y Londres: Guilford, pp. 397-412.
Cooper, B.; J. Glaesser; R. Gomm y M. Hammersley (2012). Challenging the qualitative-quantitative divide. Explorations in case-focused casual analysis. Nueva York: Continuum.
Copeland, A. y D. Agosto (2012). Diagrams and relational maps: The use of graphic elicitation techniques with interviewing for data collection, analysis, and display. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), pp. 513-533.
Corbin, J. y A. Strauss (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, pp. 3-21.
Denzin, N. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), pp. 419-427.
Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43, pp. 547-579.
Donnelly, P. y J. Hogan (2013). Engaging students in the classroom: ‘How can I know what I think until I see what I draw?’ European Political Science, 12, pp. 365-383.
Duneier, M. (2012). Qualitative methods. En: G. Ritzer (ed.). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 73-81.
Duneier, M. (2011). How not to lie in ethnography. Sociological Methodology, 41(1), pp. 1-11.
Emerson, R. (2009). Ethnography, interaction and ordinary trouble. Ethnography, 10(4), pp. 535-548.
Farnsworth, J. y B. Boon (2010). Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research, 10(5), pp. 605-624.
Fielding, N. y J. Fielding (1986). Linking data: The articulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Frey, L.; C. Botan y G. Kreps (2000). Investigating communication. An introduction to research methods. Needham Heights: Allyn y Bacon.
Gadamer, H. (1990[1967]). Truth and method. Nueva York: Crossroad.
Gilbert, D.; S. Fiske y G. Lindzey (1998). The handbook of social psychology. Nueva York: Random House.
Glaser, B. y A. Strauss (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing Company.
Goldthorpe, J. (2007). On sociology. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guillemin, M. (2004). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2), pp. 272-289.
Hogan, B.; J. Carrasco y B. Wellman (2007). Visualizing personal networks: Working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods, 19(2), pp. 116-144.
Holen, A. (2000). The PBL group: self-reflections and feedback for improved learning and growth. Medical Teacher, 22(5), pp. 485-488.
Kearney, K. y A. Hyle (2004). Drawing out emotions: The use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 4(3), pp. 361-382.
Kirk, J. y M. Miller (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.
Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [en línea], 6. Disponible en: <http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/20/43> [acceso 21/01/2017].
Konecki, K. (2011). Visual grounded theory: A methodological outline and examples from empirical work. Revija za Sociologiju, 41(2), pp. 131-160.
Koppitz, E. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. Nueva York: Grune y Stratton.
Leonard, M. (2007). Children’s drawings as a methodological tool. Irish Journal of Sociology, 15(2), pp. 52-66.
Leonard, M. y M. McKnight (2014). Look and tell: using photo-elicitation methods with teenagers. Children’s Geographies, 13(6), pp. 629-642.
Levick, M. (1983). They could not talk and so they drew: Children’s styles of coping and thinking. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.
Malchiodi, C. (2012). Understanding children’s drawings. Nueva York: Guilford Press.
Moran-Ellis, J.; V. D. Alexander; A. Cronin; M. Dickinson; J. Fielding; J. Sleney y H. Thomas (2006). Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), pp. 45-59.
Morse, J. (1994). Designed funded qualitative research. En: N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 220-235.
Myers, O.; C. Saunders y E. Garret (2003). What do children think animals need? Aesthetic and psycho-social conceptions. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), pp. 305-325.
Nadai, E. y C. Maeder (2005). Fuzzy fields. Multi-sited ethnography in sociological research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6, pp. 1-13.
Napoli, P. (1947). The interpretative aspects of finger-painting. Journal of Psychology, 23(1), pp. 93-132.
Nieminen, J.; P. Sauri y K. Lonka (2006). On the relationship between group functioning and study success in problem‐based learning. Medical Education, 40(1), pp. 64-71.
O’Reilly, M. y N. Parker (2012). Unsatisfactory saturation: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), pp. 190-197.
Packard, J. (2008). ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out there’: The power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies, 23(1), pp. 63-77.
Palmberg, I. y J. Kuru (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), pp. 32-36.
Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. Londres: Sage.
Plummer, K. (1999). The ‘ethnographic society’ at century’s end: Clarifying the role of public ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(6), pp. 641-649.
Plummer, K. (2007). The call of life stories in ethnographic research. En: P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Coffey, J. Lofland y L. Lofland. Handbook of ethnography. Londres: Sage, pp. 395-406.
Schwandt, T. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), pp. 58-72.
Schwartz, D. (1989). Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 12, pp. 119-154.
Schyns, B.; A. Tymon; T. Kiefer y R. Kerschreiter (2013). New ways to leadership development: A picture paints a thousand words. Management Learning, 44(1), pp. 11-24.
Shapiro, B. (1997). Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What’s really at stake in the disputes? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), pp. 165-185.
Tay-Lim, J. y S. Lim (2013). Privileging younger children’s voices in research: Use of drawings and a co-construction process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), pp. 65-83.
Tracy, S. (2010). Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), pp. 837-851.
Tracy, S.; P. Lutgen-Sandvik y J. Alberts (2006). Nightmares, demons and slaves: Exploring the painful metaphors of workplace bullying. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(2), pp. 148-185.
Umoquit, M.; P. Tso; T. Varga-Atkins; M. O’Brien y J. Wheeldon (2013). Diagrammatic elicitation: Defining the use of diagrams in data collection. The Qualitative Report, 18(60), pp. 1-12.
Venturelli, J. (1997). Educación médica: nuevos enfoques, metas y métodos. Washington: OPS.
Weed, M. (2008). A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: Issues in the development of ‘meta-interpretation’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(1), pp. 13-28.
Weed, M. (2005). Meta interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [en línea], 6. Disponible en: <http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/508> [acceso 21/01/2017].
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Ricardo A. Ayala, Tomás Koch
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
